DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PG-0033377·shasta·Probate·Guardianship of the Person
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

GUARDIANSHIP OF DA VIANE SCHOLFIELD

Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person

Hearing date
Jul 13, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAllysa Barber

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PG-0033377 This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person. The Petition was filed by the minor’s non-relative caregiver, Allysa Barber. Letters of Temporary Guardianship were not requested.

A new Notice of Hearing has not been filed and served for today’s date. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the minor, mother, father, maternal

grandparents, paternal grandparents, or sibling. Insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice to these parties. The Court has reviewed the Children’s Services report filed on July 2, 2026, which recommends the Court deny the Petition. The report states that the minor is currently in the care of Margorita Martinez, that Ms. Martinez has petitioned for guardianship of the minor’s sister, and is in the process of filing for guardianship of Daviane. Additionally, the report indicates the minor is a member of the Pit River Tribe and the Tribe is supportive of placement with Ms. Martinez. Considering Petitioner’s failure to file and serve the documents necessary to move forward and the report from Children’s Services, the Petition is DENIED without prejudice. The clerk is directed to close the file. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF ISABELLA SCHOLFIELD

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share