DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PG-0033318·shasta·Probate·Guardianship of the Person
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

GUARDIANSHIP OF ISABELLA SCHOLFIELD

Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person

Hearing date
Jul 13, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 17, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMargorita Martinez

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PG-0033318 This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person. The Petition was filed by the minor’s non-relative caregiver, Margorita Martinez. Letters of Temporary Guardianship were not requested.

The mother, father, and sibling have consented to the guardianship and waived notice. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the paternal grandmother and insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice. The paternal grandmother may be served by mail. Prob. Code § 1511(c). Alternatively, the paternal grandmother can sign a consent and waiver of notice, in lieu of being served.

The Court has reviewed the Children’s Services report filed on May 1, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. ICWA notification has been properly given, and no tribe has requested to intervene in this matter.

The matter is continued to Monday, August 17, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for further proceedings on the Petition. Petitioner is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on the paternal grandmother. In the alternative, if Petitioner cannot serve the paternal grandmother, the Court will require a declaration explaining in detail all efforts of Petitioner to locate and serve her and why she cannot be served, to permit the Court to dispense with notice. Warning: Failure to properly effect service or provide adequate basis to dispense with service as to the necessary parties will result in denial of the Petition. Notice is preserved. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF LEIA & ELIJAH SHARPE

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share