Motion for entry of judgment
PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026
These are the tentative rulings for civil law and motion matters set at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. The tentative ruling will be the court’s final ruling unless notice of appearance and request for oral argument are given to all parties and the court by 4:00 p.m., Monday, July 13, 2026. Notice of request for oral argument to the court must be made by calling (916) 408-6481. Requests for oral argument made by any other method will not be accepted. Prevailing parties are required to submit orders after hearing to the court within 10 court days of the scheduled hearing date, and after approval as to form by opposing counsel. Court reporters are not provided by the court. Parties may provide a court reporter at their own expense.
Except as otherwise noted, these tentative rulings are issued by the HONORABLE TRISHA J. HIRASHIMA and if oral argument is requested, it will be heard at 8:30 a.m. in Department 32, located at 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville, California 95678.
PLEASE NOTE: REMOTE APPEARANCES ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED FOR ALL CIVIL LAW AND MOTION MATTERS. (Local Rule 10.24.) More information is available at the court’s website: www.placer.courts.ca.gov.
1. M-CV-0086393 LVNV Funding LLC, v. Kumansky, Alex
The motion for entry of judgment is dropped from calendar as no moving papers were filed noticing this date. This may have been a duplicative reservation, as a motion for entry of judgment was noticed for June 30, 2026 and that hearing was continued to August 11, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 32. The August 11th hearing remains as scheduled.
2. M-CV-0094212 Scoubes, Jonas v. American Express Co.
Moving party is advised the notice of motion must include notice of the court’s tentative ruling procedures. (Local Rule 20.2.3(C).)
Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and stay action
Defendant moves to compel arbitration and stay the action. Plaintiff filed an untimely opposition. In the court’s discretion, it will consider plaintiff’s filing.
A request to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) may be brought in state court. (Southland Corp. v. Keating (1984) 465 U.S. 1, 16; Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 19, 24.) The arbitration statutes
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”