Andrade v. Fitness on Fire LLC

TENTATIVE RULINGS

DEPARTMENT N17

Judge Craig L. Griffin

Date: July 13, 2026 Time: 2:00 PM

If you are submitting to the tentative, please call the Clerk at (657) 622-5617.

Appearances may be IN PERSON or through ZOOM. If appearing by ZOOM, go to https://www.occourts.org/media-relations/civil.html and click on the yellow box that reads: “CLICK HERE TO APPEAR FOR THE ONLINE CHECK-IN/ZOOM PILOT PROGRAM.” Call the department with any questions.

COURT REPORTERS: Official Court Reporters (i.e. Court Reporters employed by the Court) are NOT typically provided for law and motion matters in this department. If a party desires a record of a law and motion proceeding, it will be the party’s responsibility to provide a court reporter. Parties must comply with the Court’s policy on the use of privately retained court reporters which can be found at:

• Civil Court Reporter Pooling; and

• For additional information, please see the Court’s website at Court Reporter Interpreter Services for additional information regarding the availability of Court Reporters.

PUBLIC ACCESS: The public may attend the ZOOM session by telephone. Call the department for a call-in number.

# 1 Grant v. O/C Newrez, LLC 2 Andrade v. Before the Court at present is the Motion to Tax Costs filed on Fitness on Fire 4/24/26 by Plaintiff Sisi Andrade (“Plaintiff”), regarding the LLC Memorandum of Costs (“MOC”) filed on 4/9/25 by Defendant Fitness on Fire, LLC (“Defendant”).

If the items appearing in a cost bill appear to be proper charges, the burden is on the party seeking to tax costs to show that they were not reasonable or necessary. But if the items are properly objected to, they are put in issue and the burden of proof is on the party claiming them as costs. (Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 761, 774.)

Here, the Motion challenges each of the three categories claimed by Defendant in the MOC – Categories 1, 4 and 11. But for each of these categories, Defendant has responded with sufficient evidence to show that the sums claimed were reasonable, and reasonably necessary to the litigation. (See Ortiz Decl. ¶¶ 4-9.) Plaintiff’s Motion is therefore DENIED.