Petition of Kevin Starks
Motion to Compel Discovery
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger
Department 5 May 6, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed
16 CV67134 Petition of Kevin Starks 04/11/2025
Kevin Starks Pro Per
School District of Curtis Creek Attorney: Yet Not Entered Elementary Motion Hearing - Compel Discovery 04/11/2025 Petition File Tracking 12/26/2025 High Density
Case notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear unless this note indicates that “no appearance is necessary.” Unless directed otherwise, all participants may appear via Zoom: https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Passcode: 123456]. All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are assigned to that department for all pre-trial purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal. Const. art VI §21 to decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due notice, parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.
This case involves an employment dispute and allegations of retaliatory animus. Defendant’s request to continue the hearing two weeks (to May 20 @ 8:30 a.m.) is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to give notice to plaintiff forthwith.
4/30/2026 3:47 pm
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.