Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs Pursuant to CCP 425.16 (Anti-SLAPP)
26CV-00334 Raymond Lamerson vs Meyer Pink Law, et al.
Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs Pursuant to CCP 425.16 (Anti- SLAPP)
Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs is GRANTED.
The amount of attorney's fees awarded is a matter within the court's discretion. (Clayton Development Co. v. Falvey (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 438, 447.) "The amount of an attorney fee award under the anti-SLAPP statute is computed by the trial court in accordance with the familiar 'lodestar' method." (Cabral v. Martins (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 471, 491 [citing Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1135-1136.) "Under that method, the court 'tabulates the attorney fee touchstone, or lodestar, by multiplying the number of hours reasonably expensed by the reasonable hours rate prevailing in the community of similar work." (Ibid.)
Counsel for Defendant seeks to set the lodestar at $6,336 and requests an additional $112.59 for costs. A trial court may not rubberstamp a request for attorney’s fees, and must determine the number of hours reasonably expended. (Donahue v. Donahue (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 259, 271.) Here, the total of 12.8 hours billed for the motion are reasonable.
The court must then look at the hourly rate. The reasonable hourly rate is that prevailing in the community for similar work. (PLCM Group v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1084, 1095.) Accordingly, following a careful review of the work required the court finds it reasonable to reduce the hourly rate from $495 to $350.
With the adjustment to the hourly rate, the lodestar is set at $4,480.
Costs are awarded in the amount of $112.59. Total attorney’s fees and costs are awarded in the amount of $4,592.59. The attorney’s fees and costs are to be paid within thirty (30) days of this court’s order.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”