DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2017-00903358·orange·ComplexCivil·Employment
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Dang vs. Allegis Group, Inc.

Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
CX101
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Mar 19, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDang
DefendantAllegis Group, Inc.

Ruling

The Court agrees, however, that the subpoena is otherwise overbroad as drafted. There appears to be no reason why essentially every document related to H.G.’s employment, from her job application to her complete personnel file, is particularly relevant.

Accordingly, the subpoena is modified to provide for the production of wage, payroll, and hours records; forms W-2, W-9, and 1099 (with social security numbers redacted); and records relating to claims of H.G.’s accidents or injuries in the Center’s files.

IV. Fees and Costs

In reply, Plaintiffs abandon their initial request for fees and costs incurred in bringing this motion. The request is therefore denied.

9 Dang vs. Allegis Group, Inc.

2017-00903358

Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint

Continued to 03/19/2027 at 9:00 a.m. per stipulation of the parties.

10 Pelayo vs. Andek Staffing Services, Inc.

2025-01524878

Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration Defendant’s Vensure HR, Inc.’s Joinder Defendant’s Westamerica Communication, Inc.’s Joinder

Before the Court are Defendants AnDek Staffing Services, Inc. and AnDek After Venture’s (collectively, “AnDek”) motion to compel arbitration (ROA 32), Defendant Westamerica Communications, Inc.’s joinder in AnDek’s motion (ROA 37), and Defendant Vensure HR, Inc.’s joinder in AnDek’s motion (ROA 42). AnDek’s motion, and the two joinders, are DENIED.

GROUNDS FOR RULING

I. Standard of Review

The moving party bears the burden of proving the existence of an arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence. (Gamboa v. Northeast Community Clinic (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 158, 164.) But the burden of production shifts in a three-step

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share