Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint
The Court agrees, however, that the subpoena is otherwise overbroad as drafted. There appears to be no reason why essentially every document related to H.G.’s employment, from her job application to her complete personnel file, is particularly relevant.
Accordingly, the subpoena is modified to provide for the production of wage, payroll, and hours records; forms W-2, W-9, and 1099 (with social security numbers redacted); and records relating to claims of H.G.’s accidents or injuries in the Center’s files.
IV. Fees and Costs
In reply, Plaintiffs abandon their initial request for fees and costs incurred in bringing this motion. The request is therefore denied.
9 Dang vs. Allegis Group, Inc.
2017-00903358
Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint
Continued to 03/19/2027 at 9:00 a.m. per stipulation of the parties.
10 Pelayo vs. Andek Staffing Services, Inc.
2025-01524878
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration Defendant’s Vensure HR, Inc.’s Joinder Defendant’s Westamerica Communication, Inc.’s Joinder
Before the Court are Defendants AnDek Staffing Services, Inc. and AnDek After Venture’s (collectively, “AnDek”) motion to compel arbitration (ROA 32), Defendant Westamerica Communications, Inc.’s joinder in AnDek’s motion (ROA 37), and Defendant Vensure HR, Inc.’s joinder in AnDek’s motion (ROA 42). AnDek’s motion, and the two joinders, are DENIED.
GROUNDS FOR RULING
I. Standard of Review
The moving party bears the burden of proving the existence of an arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence. (Gamboa v. Northeast Community Clinic (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 158, 164.) But the burden of production shifts in a three-step
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”