| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Case Management Conference
TENTATIVE RULINGS CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CALENDAR HELD IN DEPT. 18 Tuesday, May 19, 2026, 3:00 p.m. Courtroom 16 – Hon. Rene A. Chouteau for Hon. Patrick M. Broderick 3035 Cleveland Avenue, Suite 200, Santa Rosa
TO JOIN “ZOOM” ONLINE, Meeting ID: 161-460-6380 Passcode: 840359 https://sonomacourt-org.zoomgov.com/j/1614606380?pwd=NUdpOEZ0RGxnVjBzNnN6dHZ6c0ZQZz09
The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Broderick’s Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6725 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date.
The following cases are required to appear at 3:00 p.m.: 23CV02197, Philbin v. Saksen 25CV00322, Sonoma Valley Next 100 v. California Department of General Services 25CV03815, La Forge v. Whitman 25CV06499, Springfield v. Cresco Equipment Rentals & Affiliates 25CV08080, Muehl v. Nissan North America Inc 25CV08138, Salazar v. Wilson 25CV08343, Russell v. Switch Vehicles, Inc.
The following cases will be continued to a further CMC/OSC calendar in Courtroom 16 (no appearance required): 25CV02397, Gelsinger v. Alliant Specialty Insurance Services – to 11/17/26 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for case status post motion for final distribution 25CV04416, Christos v. Crane – to 11/17/26 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings and trial setting 25CV08037, Swenson v. Sebastian – to 11/17/26 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings 25CV08073, Rodriguez v. Pena, et al. – to 7/28/26 3:30 p.m., Dept. 16 for an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Failure to Timely File Proof of Service of Process, Failure to File and Serve a Timely Case Management Conference Statement, and Failure to Prosecute. An Order to Show Cause shall issue separately. 25CV08600, Tarantino v. Benchmark Builders, LLC – to 11/17/26 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings
The following cases will be set for trial with notice to follow (no appearance required): NONE
Any cases that do not appear on the list above have been DROPPED from this calendar for various reasons.
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.