In the matter of Mason Robert Pasquetti
Guardianship Review
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
ENDORSED ENDORSED
FILED BY SUPERIOR COURTOF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SIERRA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA esiiazn26 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SIERRASHANNONPEDOTTI, € LERK OF THECOURT MARY-ANN EPPS, DEPUTY
In the matter of Mason Robert Pasquetti CASE NO.: PR2092
TENTATIVE GUARDIANSHIP RULING
NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED at hearing currently set on May 20, 2026 at 1:30 PM.
The court has received and reviewed the Confidential Guardianship Status Report and Court Investigator’s Review Report and finds the guardianship remains necessary, convenient and in the best interest of the minor. The Court sets the next annual review hearing for May 26, 2027, at
1:30 PM. A current Confidential Guardianship Status Report shall be filed thirty (30) days prior
to the hearing date.
This tentative Ruling shall become the Court’s order unless a party seeking to contest the ruling contacts the Clerk of the Court no later than 3:00 p.m. on court day prior to the hearing
date and provides notice to any opposing party of the intent to appear at the hearing.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: heft of / t ¢/ Lote EY COPY | Charles H Ervin, Judge of the Superior Court
Guardianship Ruling
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.