Application For Order Granting Relief (Ccp 1008, 473) From This Courts June 03, 2026 Order For Sanctions
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, July 09, 2026, Line 11. Plaintiff Maher Memarzadeh's Application For Order Granting Relief (CCP 1008, 473) From This Courts June 03, 2026 Order For Sanctions ($1,560.00) Based Upon Impossibility Or Inability (Not Intentionality) Of Appearance is DENIED.
Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(a) permits reconsideration of a prior order when the moving party shows "new or different facts, circumstances, or law" and explains why the new or different facts, circumstances, or law were not presented earlier with reasonable diligence. (New York Times Co. v. Superior Court (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 206, 208.) "The party making the application shall state by affidavit what application was made before, when and to what judge, what order or decisions were made, and what new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed to be shown." (Code of Civil Procedure section 1008(a).) Plaintiff here has not identified new or different facts, circumstances, or law that would support reconsideration of the court's 6/3/2026 Order.
Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b) provides: "The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect." Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the court's 6/3/2026 Order was taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The court declines to reconsider its 6/3/2026 Order on its own motion. Defendants' request for additional sanctions is denied.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address.
=(302/JMQ) | |