DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21593196·sf·Civil·Civil Litigation
Hearing about 1 month agoSet for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Friday, July 10, 2026, Line 2. The full tentative ruling will be available on the San Francisco Superior Court website today after 3:00 p.m.

TANISHA COLLINS ET AL VS. CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ET AL

Motion And Notice Of Motion To Substitute Plaintiff Jordan Malachi Ty'Lee Burton As Successor In Interest To Tanisha Collins

Hearing date
Jul 10, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTANISHA COLLINS
PlaintiffJORDAN MALACHI BURTON
DefendantCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC21593196 - July 10, 2026 Hearing date: July 10, 2026 Case number: CGC21593196 Case title: TANISHA COLLINS ET AL VS. CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21593196 | Case Title: | | TANISHA COLLINS ET AL VS. CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-10 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion And Notice Of Motion To Substitute Plaintiff Jordan Malachi Ty'Lee Burton As Successor In Interest To Tanisha Collins | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Friday, July 10, 2026, Line 2.

PLAINTIFFs TANISHA COLLINS, JORDAN MALACHI BURTON,and TANISHA COLLINS' Motion And Notice Of Motion To Substitute Plaintiff Jordan Malachi Ty'Lee Burton As Successor In Interest To Tanisha Collins. (The full tentative ruling will be available on the San Francisco Superior Court website today after 3:00 p.m.) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share