DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25627209·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED. Truth of facts set forth in requests for admission no. 1-28 are deemed admitted. Monetary sanctions of $860 awarded.

ARTSIOM KHATKEVICH VS. HANNA KHATKEVICH

Motion For Deeming Admitted Truth Of Facts And Genuineness Of Documents Specified In Plaintiff's Requests for Admissiion, Set One And Imposing Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2560$160$860

Parties

PlaintiffARTSIOM KHATKEVICH
DefendantHANNA KHATKEVICH

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Thursday, July 09, 2026, Line 8, PLAINTIFF ARTSIOM KHATKEVICH Motion For Deeming Admitted Truth Of Facts And Genuineness Of Documents Specified In Plaintiff's Requests for Admissiion, Set One And Imposing Monetary Sanctions.

1 - Plaintiff served Defendant with a written requests for admissions on April 15, 2026. Defendant did not respond to the requests. Plaintiff's motion requests that the truth of the facts stated in the requests be deemed admitted, and that the court impose a monetary sanction of $2560 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2023.030. Defendant did not file a written opposition to the motion.

The motion is granted. The truth of the facts set forth in Plaintiff's requests for admission no. 1-28 are deemed admitted. (CCP 2033.820(c)) Plaintiff, a self-represented litigant, did not present facts which support compensating his time at $160 per hour. The court awards monetary sanctions of $860, payable within 30 days after service of the order After hearing.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CM). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share