Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Date

Live data

6,012 rulings indexed. Last ingest less than a minute ago.

Scraper runs every ~15 min during California business hours.

Explore

Monitored counties + coverage Judge directory Attorney directory Help · About the dataset Public API About DecisionDepot

Open source

Pipeline + web app are open on GitHub.

DecisionDepot is for informational use only. Not legal advice. Always verify against the source PDF before relying on any ruling.

Case	County / Judge	Motion	Ruling	Date

25PB-0033123 · SHASTA · Probate · Dept 44

ESTATE OF GORODON ROTH

Case Information

Hearing date: May 11, 2026

Department: 44

Judge: Unknown

Prevailing party: N/A

Ruling: CONTINUED

Appearance: Not required

Case type: Estate Administration

Next hearing: Jun 29, 2026

Motion(s)

Objection to the decedent’s will

Motion Type Tags

Petition

Parties

Plaintiff: Kim Schulz
Defendant: Martha Blobgett
Defendant: Anthony Roth

Ruling

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on an Objection to the decedent’s will, filed by Kim Schulz. The matter has not been properly noticed. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for Martha Blobgett or Anthony Roth. A summons has been issued regarding the Objection, however there is no proof of service of the summons on any parties entitled to notice. The matter is continued to Monday, June 29, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings regarding the Objection. A new Notice of Hearing is required to be timely filed and served, along with a copy of the Objection, on all parties entitled to notice. A summons is required to be issued and served in compliance with Probate Code 8250. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Source: California Superior Court tentative ruling. Retrieved from DecisionDepot on 5/18/2026. Not legal advice.