Motion for Leave to File a Cross-Complaint
26CV174849: MEADORS vs JEFFRYES 07/09/2026 Hearing on Motion for Leave to File a Cross-Complaint filed by Raychelle Jeffryes (Defendant) CRS# 669127107761 in Department 23
Tentative Ruling - 07/07/2026 Ruben Sundeen
The Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint filed by Raychelle Jeffryes on 03/30/2026 is Denied.
The motion for leave to file a cross-complaint is DENIED without prejudice for lack of service. Defendant and cross-complainant Williams may re-file the motion with proper service. The Court further notes that the proposed cross-complaint appears to contain 50 pages of attachments, including photos and numerous screenshots. If Williams re-files the motion, the proposed cross-complaint should state the relevant facts in ordinary and concise language. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 425.10.)
*If a party does not timely contest the tentative ruling and appear at the hearing, the tentative ruling will become the order of the Court.*
How to Contest a Tentative Ruling
Through the eCourt Public Portal
To contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court and all parties no later than 4:00 p.m. one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue by completing the following steps:
1. Log in to the eCourt Public Portal.
2. Select Case Search.
3. Enter the case number and select Search.
4. Select the case name.
5. Select the Tentative Rulings tab.
6. Click Contest This Ruling.
7. Enter your name and reason for contesting.
8. Select Proceed.
You must also notify the department and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. one court day before the hearing. Notice to the department must be sent to: Dept23@alameda.courts.ca.gov.
Remote Appearance Information 26CV174849: MEADORS vs JEFFRYES 07/09/2026 Hearing on Motion for Leave to File a Cross-Complaint filed by Raychelle Jeffryes (Defendant) CRS# 669127107761 in Department 23 For Department 23 Zoom appearance information, please visit:
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Please provide this information to any self-represented or opposing parties.