Jerisat vs. Young

character of outrage frequently associated with crime”]; Veh. Code, § 20001, subds. (a)-(b) [felony offense for a driver involved in an injury accident to fail to provide the information and assistance required by Veh. Code, §§ 20003-20004]; see also Compl. ¶¶ MV-1, GN-1(2)-(3), IT-1(3), IT-1(5), EX-2(2)-(3).)

Defendant shall give notice.

3 FCI Lender Services, Inc. vs. Tenenbaum

2026-01557568 Demurrer to Complaint

Vacated. See minute order dated 6/26/26. 4 Jerisat vs. Young

2025-01476022 Motion for Order to Prohibit Plaintiff from Appearing in Pro Per

Defendant Steven Young’s Motion to Prohibit Plaintiff Martin Jerisat from Appearing in Pro Per at Court Proceedings is DENIED. As an initial matter, the notice of motion does not provide 16 court days (plus two court days for manner of service) of notice of the hearing. Even if this procedural defect is set aside, the Motion is moot, as Plaintiff Martin Jerisat has filed an association of counsel, which absolves all of the purported concerns Defendant Young lists as a basis for this motion.

Plaintiff shall provide notice.

5 JIMENEZ vs. CLEARPATH MEDICAL, LLC

2026-01556323 Demurrer to Complaint

Defendant ClearPath Medical, LLC’s Demurrer to the Complaint is SUSTAINED.

The demurrer has not been opposed by Plaintiff Karina Fernandez Jimenez.

Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the demurrer may be treated as an implied concession to the merits of the same. (Herzberg v. County of Plumas (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1, 20.) Additionally, the court may construe the absence of a memorandum as waiver of all grounds not supported. (CRC 3.1113(a).) Based upon these grounds, and the reasons stated below, the court SUSTAINS the unopposed demurrer.

First Cause of Action – Pregnancy Discrimination