N/A
timely and properly serve Respondent and to file proof of such service at least five court days before the continued hearing date. Petitioner is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
4. The City of Dana Point vs. SND, L.P. 2026-01570223 CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 17, 2026, AT 2:00 P.M., pursuant to stipulation and order entered on July 6, 2026.
5. McMillan vs. Exir Co., Inc. 2012-00564599 Before the court is the motion of defendant Abraham N. Mourshaki (Defendant) to deposit funds with the court and for entry of satisfaction of judgment. The court will not post a tentative ruling on the merits of this motion. Instead, both Defendant and plaintiff Richard V. McMillan (Plaintiff) are ordered to appear for the hearing to discuss the motion and resolution of the parties’ dispute regarding the amount required to fully satisfy the judgment. Remote appearances are acceptable for purposes of this hearing.
6. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan vs. Sharp Memorial Hospital 2026-01566981 Before the court is the motion to seal portions of the opposition brief and supporting documents respondents Sharp Memorial Hospital, Sharp Coronado Hospital & Healthcare Center, Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center, and Grossmont Hospital Corporation dba Sharp Grossmont Hospital (collectively, Respondents) filed in response to the petition to confirm arbitration award filed by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan (Petitioner). As more fully set forth below, the hearing is CONTINUED TO THURSDAY, AUGUST 13, 2026, AT 2:00 P.M., IN DEPARTMENT C23, for Respondents to provide unredacted copies of the documents sought to be sealed, potentially narrow the request to seal, and potentially make a more detailed and specific showing to support the sealing request.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551, Respondents request the court seal portions of the opposition to the Petitioner’s petition to confirm the arbitration award, portions of the declaration filed in support of the opposition, and the entirety of many of the exhibits attached to the supporting declaration. Under the Rules of Court, the party moving to seal any documents must lodge unredacted copies of those documents. (Rules Ct., rule 2.551, subdivisions (b), (d).) With electronic filing, that is customarily done by filing a public and nonpublic version of each document to be sealed.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”