Petition to confirm arbitration award; ex parte application for order permitting service via electronic mail
by Respondent. Further, the court finds the Petition complies with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 1285.4. Accordingly, the arbitrator’s Award in favor of Petitioner is CONFIRMED. Petitioner’s request for an additional award of interest or attorney’s fees beyond the amounts stated in the award is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Petitioner has failed to submit calculations or evidence supporting such. (See Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 216, 224 [“In law and motion practice, factual evidence is supplied to the court by way of declarations”].) Indeed, the petition is not verified and there is no declaration submitted in support of it nor are there any calculations establishing the amount of interest sought. Petitioner’s counsel is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
2. Lopez, Bark & Schulz LLP vs. Watson 2025-01537149 Before the court is (1) the continued hearing on the petition to confirm arbitration award filed by petitioner Lopez, Bark & Schulz LLP (Petitioner), and (2) Petitioner’s ex parte application for order permitting service of petition via electronic mail and/or other electronic technology pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 413.30. No tentative on the merits will be posted. The will hear from counsel at the hearing.
3. Petition of Greenberg 2026-01559277 Before the court is the petition to compel inspection of corporate records filed by petitioner David Greenberg (Petitioner). As set forth more fully below, the hearing is CONTINUED TO THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2026, AT 2:00 P.M., IN DEPARTMENT C23. A stockholder’s right to inspect the corporate books may be enforced by a writ of mandate. (Webster v. Barlett Estate Co. (1917) 35 Cal.App. 283, 285; see also Most v. First Nat. Bank of San Diego (1966) 246 Cal.App.2d 425; Tritek Telecom, Inc. v.
Superior Court (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1385.) A petition for writ of mandate must be served on respondent (and real parties in interest, if any) in the manner required for service of a summons and complaint, i.e., pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 415.10 et. seq. (
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Petitioner is ordered to