DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0000971·nevada·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

In the Matter of Catherine Gerstung

Petition to appoint a conservator

Hearing date
Apr 10, 2026
Department
6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 10, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentCatherine Gerstung

Ruling

Green to remove trustee Timothy Green, and for other relief. The Court must learn whether the petition will be opposed and, if so, when a written opposition will be filed.

If the petition is opposed, the Court is potentially inclined to order the parties to attend mediation, with costs of the same to be paid by the trust, pursuant to Probate Code section 17206 and Breslin v. Breslin (2021) 62 Cal. App.5th 801, 806 (“The probate court has the power to order the parties into mediation.”).

11. PR0000971 In the Matter of Catherine Gerstung No appearances are required. On its own motion the Court continues this matter to July 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. The Court notes deficiencies in the petition to appoint a conservator: (1) There is no proof of service of the citation. See form GC-320. (2) The medical capacity declaration has not been filed. See form GC-335. (3) Finally, the Court has not received the court investigator’s report. Petitioner shall file and serve the outstanding items as required by law as expeditiously as possible and no later than two weeks prior to the continued court date and shall also give notice of the continued court date. In addition, Petitioner shall provide a proposed order for appointment of a court investigator. See form GC-330.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share