DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
23PB-0031963·shasta·Civil·Trust Administration
The parties are ordered to appear to discuss setting this matter for trial.

IN RE HALL FAMILY TRUST

Petition to Remove Trustee and Appoint Successor Trustee

Hearing date
May 22, 2023
Department
6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Petition

Ruling

Tentative Ruling May 22, 2023 Department 6 This Court does not follow the procedures described in Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308(a). Tentative rulings appear on the calendar outside the court department on the date of the hearing, pursuant to California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(b) (1). As a courtesy to counsel, the court also posts tentative rulings no less than 12 hours in advance of the time set for hearing. The rulings are posted on the court’s website (www.shasta.courts.ca.gov) and are available by clicking on the “Tentative Rulings” link. A party is not required to give notice to the Court or other parties of intent to appear to present argument.

In furtherance of compliance with the California Department of Public Health and CDC guidelines and recommendations, the Superior Court of California, County of Shasta is continuing to undertake precautionary measures to ensure the health and safety of the courthouse users. Persons are encouraged to make appearances telephonically, through CourtCall (888-882-6878; courtcall.com).

****************************************************************************** 8:30 a.m. – Law & Motion ******************************************************************************

IN RE HALL FAMILY TRUST Case Number: 23PB-0031963 This matter is on calendar for hearing on the Petition to Remove Trustee and Appoint Successor Trustee. The matter has been properly noticed, with proof of service on file. Respondent has filed an Objection and Response to the Petition. The parties are ordered to appear to discuss setting this matter for trial.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share