DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU0002511·nevada·Civil·Case Management Conference
Hearing 5 months agoCMC continued

R. Ellis Harper vs. David M. Fischer, et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Mar 20, 2026
Department
A
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 17, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffR. Ellis Harper
DefendantDavid M. Fischer

Ruling

11. CU0002376 Rosa Maria Mosella vs. Norman Justesen, et al. No appearances are required. The case is at issue. The Court sets jury trial and related dates as follows:

Trial: February 17, 18, 19, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. each day, Dept. A PTC: January 19, 2027 at 9:00 a.m., Dept. A MSC: December 11, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., Dept. A (See, LR 4.02)

A pre-trial order shall issue. Unless a party objects to this tentative ruling, gives notice of said objection and appears for CMC, parties are deemed to have waived notice of trial AND asserted they will waive conflict at the MSC allowing the trial judge to conduct the MSC.

12. CU0002511 R. Ellis Harper vs. David M. Fischer, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion and based on Plaintiff’s assertion the case has settled but settlement terms require several months to effectuate the terms of settlement, the Court continues the case management conference to July 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department A. Plaintiff shall file a notice of settlement, or Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or Plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of Defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference. Plaintiff shall give notice of the continued court date.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share