ANDERSON et al. v. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
Case Information
Motion(s)
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PURSUANT TO CRC 3.700(a); PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBIT FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DISMISSAL
Motion Type Tags
Other
Parties
- Plaintiff: ANDERSON et al.
- Defendant: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
Ruling
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 13, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 25CV01147
ANDERSON et al. v. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PURSUANT TO CRC 3.700(a)
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL EXHIBIT FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DISMISSAL
The motions are continued to June 10, 2026. Plaintiffs are directed to file a copy of the signed settlement agreement for the Court’s review 10 days before the hearing date. The Court only received a copy of the settlement allocation plan.
Nos. 25CV01912, 25CV01913
WARMACK v. CAL. VICTIM’S COMPENSATION BOARD
PETITIONER’S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
The motions are denied.
Self-represented petitioner Dedrick Deon Warmack, Sr. brought a writ of mandate to compel the California Victim Compensation Board (“Board”) to reverse its decisions denying his applications for victim compensation for injuries sustained as a result of a documented domestic violence incident.