DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU0002597·nevada·Civil·Case Management
Hearing 4 months agoTrial set

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company vs. Troy Palmer

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Apr 27, 2026
Department
6
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Parties

PlaintiffState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
DefendantTroy Palmer

Ruling

Trial is hereby set as follows: 5-day jury trial. Trial: March 30, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: March 19, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: March 1, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

17. CU0002588 Kipling Ann Weed vs. Aaron Luther Crookston No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to August 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

18. CU0002590 Dillon John Brooks vs. Anthony Casci No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are unpaid. The Court notes Defendant has failed to timely file a case management conference statement that would alert the Court to unavailable dates.

Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day nonjury trial. Trial: April 13, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: April 2, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: March 15, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

19. CU0002591 Melanie Gans-Prosser, et al. vs. Lake of the Pines Association No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is vacated. Judge Tice-Raskin has recused himself and the case shall be reassigned.

20. CU0002595 Kyser Keeney vs. CSAA Insurance Exchange No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to August 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

21. CU0002596 Peter Moran vs. John Doe, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to September 21, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.

22. CU0002597 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company vs. Troy Palmer No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are paid.

Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial. Trial: April 13, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: April 2, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6.

MSC: March 15, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

23. CU0002598 Robert Marchi, et al. vs. FCA US LLC No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are paid.

Trial is hereby set as follows: 5-day jury trial. Trial: April 20, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: April 9, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: March 22, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

24. CU0002611 Michael McFarland, et al. vs. Caroline's Coffee Roasters No appearances are required. This case is at issue. Jury fees are paid.

Trial is hereby set as follows: 7-day jury trial. Trial: April 20, 2027, 9:00 a.m., Dept.

6. PTC: April 9, 2027, 11:00 a.m., Dept.

6. MSC: March 22, 2027, 10:00 a.m., Dept. 6.

25. CU0002612 LGC Sierra Pines MHC LLC vs. Sierra Pines Mobile Home Park No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.

26. CU21-085893 Tom Amesbury, et al. vs. Barbara Heger, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 10, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share