DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
22CV394602·santaclara·Civil·Personal Injury / Employment
GRANTED

Suzana Hosin vs. Timothy Davis, et.al.

Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
6
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Motion for Summary Judgment

Parties

PlaintiffSuzana Hosin
DefendantTimothy Davis

Ruling

To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to

Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 22CV394602 Suzana Hosin vs. Defendant flied a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed no 1 Timothy Davis, et.al. answer to defendant’s motion. Plaintiff had an accident working for the county and was given a leave of absence as well as assigned to light duty. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 9:00 23CV428070 “Janine” Chun Lu vs. See below. 2 Marc Goubert, et.al. 9:00 24CV444705 Atta Shehadey vs. Defendant filed a motion to compel further discovery. Plaintiff filed no response 3 Edward Minasian, et. to Defendant’s petition. Plaintiff’s answers were either evasive or invited a more al. full response. Defendant’s petition to compel further discovery is GRANTED. Monetary sanctions are GRANTED. 9:00 24CV454184 Mussa Seid vs. Uber See Line 4 below. 4 Technologies, Inc. 9:00 24CV449505 Teyhuan Ahluwalia Plaintiff petitions this court to compel defendant Rockwell Group Europe for further 5 vs. Children’s responses for production of documents as to Set One. The document request was Discovery Museum of served on defendant on March 27, 2025—over a year’s time. Plaintiff’s petition is San Jose et.al. GRANTED. Defendant in its moving papers indicated it can propound further discovery within 60 -90 days. Defendant is ordered to comply with court’s order within 60 days. Monetary sanctions of $2,745.00 are GRANTED. 9:00 24CV454184 Bernadette Erlach vs. Case is continued. 6 General Motors, LLC 9:00 25CV461439 Greg Schwartz Walter See Line7 below 7 vs. Ford Motor Company, et.al. 9:00 25CV471971 Ngo Vien vs June Plaintiff moves this court to appoint a partition referee. While Defendant does not 8 Vien oppose the appointment of a partition referee, Defendant and Plaintiff disagree as to who the partition referee should be. Court requests oral argument. 9:00 25CV478684 Josep Vargas vs. See below 9 Hyundai Motor America 9:00 25CV481571 Capital Asset See below. 10 Exchange & Trading LLC vs. World Tech Co. 9:01 19CV358020 Bank of America vs. Claim of exemption to wage garnishment to be heard through oral argument. 1 Sunshine Roybal

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share