DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
24CV453808·santaclara·Civil·Contract
CONTINUED

CSL Real Estate Investments, LLC v. LQDX, INC.

Motion to be relieved as counsel

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 9, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffCSL Real Estate Investments, LLC
DefendantLQDX, INC.

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: May 12, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 3 24CV453808 CSL Real Estate Motion by counsel for defendant LQDX, Inc. to be relieved as Investments, LLC, a counsel. Notice is proper and the motion is opposed by plaintiff California limited CSL Real Estate Investments, LLC, on the ground the trial is set and liability company v. a corporation cannot be self-represented. The motion is LQDX, INC., a Delaware CONTINUED to June 9, 2026, at 9:01 a.m. in Dept.

10. Counsel for Corporation defendant is ordered to inform its client that a corporation cannot be self-represented. In addition to defense counsel, a representative from defendant LQDX, Inc. must appear (either in person or by videoconference) for the continued hearing on the motion to describe efforts to obtain new counsel. If defendant finds new counsel and files a substitution of counsel form before June 9, the matter can go off calendar.

- oo0oo -

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share