Ana Stamp v. John Stewart Company et al.

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: May 12, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 12 24CV454281 Alvaro Pedroza v. Ford Click LINE 12 or scroll down for ruling. Motor Company et al. Line 13 24CV444462 Catalina Alvez et al. v. Click LINE 13 or scroll down for ruling. Tina Seng et al. Line 14 24CV444553 Ana Stamp v. John Plaintiff Ana Stamp’s motion for trial preference. Notice is proper Stewart Company et al. and the motion is opposed by defendants John Stewart Company et al.

A civil litigant “who is over 70 years of age may petition the court” for trial preference if (1) the party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole, and (2) the health of the party is such that preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party’s interest in the litigation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (a).)

A court may also grant a motion for preference “supported by a showing that satisfies the court that the interests of justice will be served by granting this preference.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (e).)

If preference is granted, “court shall set the matter for trial not more than 120 days from that date” and, subject to certain exceptions, “there shall be no continuance beyond 120 days from the granting of the motion.” (Id., subd. (f).)

It is undisputed that plaintiff in this personal injury action is 76 years old (with a birthdate in October 1949). The declaration from plaintiff’s counsel describes plaintiff’s health issues, including an emergency room visit in January 2026.

The court finds trial preference is necessary in this matter, under Code of Civil Procedure section 36, subdivisions (a) and (d). Defendants’ arguments that plaintiff’s showing is inadequate are unpersuasive. The motion is GRANTED.