DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
25CV469588·santaclara·Civil·Debt Collection
CONTINUED

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA vs ANTON MAKEDONOV

Judgment on Pleadings

Hearing date
May 8, 2026
Department
13
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 1, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK, NA
DefendantANTON MAKEDONOV

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13 Honorable Daniel T. Nishigaya R. Belligan, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2240

DATE: May 8, 2026 TIME: 9:00 & 9:01 A.M. TO CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING, YOU MUST CALL (408) 808-6856 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING. You must also inform all other sides to the issue before 4:00 P.M. the day prior to the hearing that you plan to contest the ruling. The Court will not hear argument, and the tentative ruling will be adopted if these notifications are not made. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1); Civil Local Rule 8.D.)

LINE 7 24CV448687 ISJ General Trading, LLC vs Capital Hearing: Demurrer Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC The Court has received no opposition from Plaintiff. “[T]he failure to file an opposition creates an inference that the ... demurrer is meritorious.” (Sexton v. Super Ct. (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) The Court has considered Defendant’s arguments. Good cause appearing, the demurrer to the second, third, and fourth cause of action is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.

Defendant to prepare the final order, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS- 020, within 10 days of the date of the hearing. LINE 8 24CV452572 Gary Roberts vs CERBERUS Motion: Change of Venue SENTINEL et al Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 8 for tentative ruling. LINE 9 25CV469588 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA vs Motion: Judgment on Pleadings ANTON MAKEDONOV This motion has been CONTINUED to July 1, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 13 by ex parte order of May 7, 2026.

4

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share