Santa Clara Valley Water District v. The City of San Jose, et al.
MOTION: ORDER
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 05/13/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE 4 25CV470867 Michael Leobo DEMURRER v. Kaiser Permanente et al. Demurrer to the FAC is Unopposed and Sustained with 15 days leave to amend LINE 5 25CV475894 Santa Clara Valley MOTION: ORDER Water District v. The City of San Jose, et Plaintiff Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Motion for Prejudgment al. Possession
Notice is proper. Unopposed. Good cause appearing, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff to prepare the proposed order, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the hearing. LINE 6 25CV477676 Linda Johnson et al. MOTION: Leave to Amend v. Hanford Hotels Inc. et al. Please control click or scroll down to Line 6 LINE 7 23CV426893 Surface Art MOTION TO COMPEL Engineering, Inc. v. Kent, Kim Please control click or scroll down to Line 7 LINE 8 25CV460776 Robert Bigler et al. MOTION TO COMPEL v. Xie Tan Lee, et al. Settlement agreement pending. Off Calendar 9:01 21CV376210 Ku et al Hearing: Order of Examination v. Herchen et al
- oo0oo -
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.