Tapia v. Sanford
Motion to be relieved as counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
Case: Tapia v. Sanford Case No. CV2025-2090 Hearing Date: July 9, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.
Malek H. Shraibati of BD&J, P.C.’s unopposed motion to be relieved as counsel for plaintiff Alberto Herrera Tapia is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.) Mr. Shraibati has not filed a proof of service showing that the notice of motion and motion, the declaration, and the proposed order were timely served on his client. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d), 3.1300(c).)
The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.
If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.
7 of 7
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”