DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
23-CIV-05021·sanmateo·Civil·Motion to Stay
DENIED AS MOOT

CITY OF SAN BRUNO, ET AL VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION, ET AL

Motion to Stay

Hearing date
May 13, 2026
Department
28
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffCITY OF SAN BRUNO
DefendantCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION

Attorneys

TRISHA A. ORTIZfor Plaintiff
ANNA BARSEGYANfor Defendant

Ruling

May 13, 2026, Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________

02:00 PM LINE 2 23-CIV-05021 CITY OF SAN BRUNO, ET AL VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION, ET AL

CITY OF SAN BRUNO TRISHA A. ORTIZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION ANNA BARSEGYAN

Motion to Stay

TENTATIVE RULING:

Respondents and Defendants California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s and Trista Gonzalez’s Motion to Stay Proceedings is DENIED AS MOOT.

Respondents and Defendants California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s and Trista Gonzalez’s Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as irrelevant.

In light of the ruling sustaining the accompanying demurrer without leave to amend, the motion to stay is denied as moot.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, respondent’s counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share