DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
FDI-23-798739·sf·FamilyLaw·Enforcement of Order
CONTINUED

Remy Tahir Goode v. Leonard Goode

Request for Order re Enforcement of Order, Family Code 271 Sanctions

Hearing date
Apr 16, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Motion for Sanctions

Monetary amounts referenced

$40,000$9,797.50

Parties

PetitionerRemy Tahir Goode
RespondentLeonard Goode

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 REMY TAHIR GOODE,) Case Number: FDI-23-798739) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: April 16, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 LEONARD GOODE,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER, FAMILY CODE 271 SANCTIONS 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The parties are ordered to appear. The parties may appear in person in Dept. 403 or remotely by 15 Zoom video. If a party chooses to appear by video, that party must abide by the Notice and 16 Instructions for Remote Appearances in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 17

18 On for hearing on 4/16/26 is Petitioner’s Request for Order filed 3/28/35 seeking: (a) enforcement of the 19 Court’s 1/15/25 Findings and Order After Hearing (FOAH) ordering Respondent to pay Petitioner 20 $40,000 in Family Code section 2030 attorney’s fees; and (b) $9,797.50 in Family Code section 271 21 sanctions. On 3/28/25, Petitioner concurrently filed a supportive declaration and attorney declaration 22 substantiating her requests. The matter was set for hearing on 5/9/25 then subsequently continued to 23 8/7/25, 1/27/25, and 4/16/25. 24

25 On 8/1/25, the parties entered a Stipulation and Order which provides Respondent 30 days to pay 26 outstanding attorney’s fees to counsel for Petitioner. 27

28 The parties are ordered to appear, and Petitioner shall be prepared to inform the Court whether 29 Respondent has complied with the Court’s 1/15/25 FOAH in full or in part.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share