DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25622934·sf·Civil·Partition of Real Property
CONTINUED

DANIEL HAIM HOFFMAN ET AL VS. DAVID KOSLOWSKI ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint Appraiser To Determine Fair Market Value Under Partition Of Real Property Act

Hearing date
May 15, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 24, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffDANIEL HAIM HOFFMAN
DefendantDAVID KOSLOWSKI

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622934 - May 15, 2026 Hearing date: May 15, 2026 Case number: CGC25622934 Case title: DANIEL HAIM HOFFMAN ET AL VS. DAVID KOSLOWSKI ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622934 | Case Title: | | DANIEL HAIM HOFFMAN ET AL VS. DAVID KOSLOWSKI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint Appraiser To Determine Fair Market Value Under Partition Of Real Property Act; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Maya Rhode | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 15, 2026. Line 3.

PLAINTIFF Motion To Appoint Appraiser To Determine Fair Market Value Under Partition Of Real Property Act; is CONTINUED to June 24, 2026 for a hearing to determine the FMV of the property pursuant to CCP section 874.316(f).

Parties to prepare a form of notice in compliance with CCP 874.316(e) and deliver it to the Court no later than 9:00 a.m. on May 15, 2026. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share