DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD24674274·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
DENIED

BRIXTON CP CHINATOWN, LLC VS. MICHAEL SHAWN CAVERLY ET AL

Motion to Substitute Party

Hearing date
May 14, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffBRIXTON CP CHINATOWN, LLC
DefendantMICHAEL SHAWN CAVERLY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24674274 - May 14, 2026 Hearing date: May 14, 2026 Case number: CUD24674274 Case title: BRIXTON CP CHINATOWN, LLC VS. MICHAEL SHAWN CAVERLY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24674274 | Case Title: | | BRIXTON CP CHINATOWN, LLC VS. MICHAEL SHAWN CAVERLY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Substitute Party | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing motion calendar for May 14, 2026, line 4.

Clay Kearny Merchant Corporation's Motion to Substitute Party is DENIED. Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in support of the motion as required per C.R.C. 3.1112(a)(3). This motion is accordingly denied pursuant to C.R.C. 3.1113(a). =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share