JOHN DOE VS. DAVID B. YEARY
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Under Pseudonym
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC26634703 - May 14, 2026 Hearing date: May 14, 2026 Case number: CGC26634703 Case title: JOHN DOE VS. DAVID B. YEARY Case Number: | | CGC26634703 | Case Title: | | JOHN DOE VS. DAVID B. YEARY | Court Date: | | 2026-05-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Under Pseudonym | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing motion calendar for May 14, 2026, line 3.
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Pseudonym is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to support the motion with sufficient facts and evidence establishing an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to court records, and a substantial probability that interest will be prejudiced if a pseudonym is not used. Conclusory fears of reputational and economic injury do not outweigh the public's substantial and presumptive interest in disclosure. (Roe v. Smith (2025) 116 Cal.App.5th 227, 244.) =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.