DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD26681510·sf·Civil·Real Property
OFF CALENDAR

1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Case For Trial; Motion For Trial Preference; And Motion For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
May 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

Plaintiff1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP
DefendantSHAVON BUTLER ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681510 - May 13, 2026 Hearing date: May 13, 2026 Case number: CUD26681510 Case title: 1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681510 | Case Title: | | 1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Case For Trial; Motion For Trial Preference; And Motion For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing motion calendar for May 13, 2026, line 5.

Defendant's Motion to Set Case for Trial; Motion for Trial Preference; and Motion for Monetary Sanctions is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005(b).

This matter will be heard in department 514 by the Honorable Daniel A. Flores at 9:30 a.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/DAF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 163 4591; Password: 352980; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 163 4591; Password: 352980).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share