DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD25680648·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
GRANTED

THOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC VS. AUJAINE MCALLISTER ET AL

MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT

Hearing date
May 13, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant
Next hearing
May 18, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffTHOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC
DefendantAUJAINE MCALLISTER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680648 - May 13, 2026 Hearing date: May 13, 2026 Case number: CUD25680648 Case title: THOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC VS. AUJAINE MCALLISTER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680648 | Case Title: | | THOMAS PAINE SQUARE LLC VS. AUJAINE MCALLISTER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing motion calendar for May 13, 2026, line 4.

Defendant's Motion Set Aside Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant provides no authority standing for the proposition that, if a trial department is not immediately available at the time set for trial, a short continuance requires the Court to reset the trial date on full notice. However, the Court's record does not reflect whether, how, or when Defendant was given any notice of the continued trial date. Therefore, the judgment is set aside.

This matter is reset for jury trial on May 18, 2026 in Department 501 at 9:00 a.m. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share