DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25626616·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
OFF CALENDAR

GRACE WAIKWAN WONG VS. SIMON PO WAI WONG ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment As To Cross-Complaint Of Simon Po Wai Wong And Xueqin Shuai For Failure To Amend

Hearing date
May 13, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffGRACE WAIKWAN WONG
DefendantSIMON PO WAI WONG
DefendantXUEQIN SHUAI

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25626616 - May 13, 2026 Hearing date: May 13, 2026 Case number: CGC25626616 Case title: GRACE WAIKWAN WONG VS. SIMON PO WAI WONG ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626616 | Case Title: | | GRACE WAIKWAN WONG VS. SIMON PO WAI WONG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Entry Of Judgment As To Cross-Complaint Of Simon Po Wai Wong And Xueqin Shuai For Failure To Amend |

Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing motion calendar for May 13, 2026, line 2. Cross Defendant's Motion for Entry of Judgment as to Cross-Complaint of Simon Po Wai Wong and Xueqin Shuai for Failure to Amend is OFF CALENDAR. Dismissal of the Cross-complaint on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share