DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25631212·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
CONTINUED

SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION ET AL VS. SMARTRENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 22, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffSAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION
DefendantSMARTRENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DefendantEQUITY RESIDENTIAL, A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
DefendantERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DefendantEQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC
DefendantEQUITY-TASMAN APARTMENTS LLC
DefendantARCHSTONE DAGGETT PLACE LLC
DefendantARCHSTONE SOUTH MARKET LP
DefendantEQR-TERRACES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 12, 2026. Line 4. DEFENDANT EQUITY RESIDENTIAL, A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, ERP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT LLC, EQUITY-TASMAN APARTMENTS LLC, ARCHSTONE DAGGETT PLACE LLC, ARCHSTONE SOUTH MARKET LP, EQR-TERRACES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION is CONTINUED to May 22, 2026 for the opposition party to comply with SFLR 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition no later than May 14, 2025 with a cover letter reflecting new hearing date. (Moving papers and reply received). =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share