DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV04386·butte·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Wells Fargo Bank, N A v. Yang, Lang

Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions as Admitted; Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWells Fargo Bank, N A
DefendantYang, Lang

Ruling

6. 25CV04208 Curtis-Brown, Stephanie v. Marple, Larry et al

EVENT: Plaintiff’s Motion for Deemed Admissions and Request for Sanctions

Plaintiff’s Motion for Deemed Admissions is moot in light of the responses provided while this motion was pending. The Court finds the responses were untimely and as a result all objections are waived. As to sanctions, contrary to Defendant’s position, the failure to timely respond can, under certain circumstances, warrant sanctions in and of itself. The critical consideration is whether or not it was reasonable for Plaintiff to file the motion at the time the motion was filed. Considering these requests were initially served in December 2025 and that a generous extension from 3/6 – 4/5 was provided, it was reasonable to file a motion two days after that extension had expired.

The fact responses were not provided for roughly another 3 weeks after the motion was filed demonstrates the motion was appropriate at the time it was filed. Defendant (not defense counsel) is sanctioned in the amount of $2,160.00. Sanctions are payable within 20 days. Plaintiff shall prepare the form of order within two weeks.

7-8. 25CV04386 Wells Fargo Bank, N A v. Yang, Lang

EVENT: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions as Admitted (2) Case Management Conference

Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions as Admitted is GRANTED. The Court will sign the proposed order.

3|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share