DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
20CV01737·butte·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Zebley, David v. Zolla Financial, LLC et al.

Receiver’s Motion for Order Approving Settlement Agreement

Hearing date
Jun 3, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffZebley, David
DefendantZolla Financial, LLC

Ruling

Judge Benson – Law & Motion – Wednesday, June 3, 2026 @ 9:00 AM

1. 20CV00109 Belyew, Lisa v. Belyew, Tait

EVENT: Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Dismissal

Plaintiff’s Motion to set aside the dismissal is granted. A further Case Management Conference is hereby scheduled for August 12, 2026 at 10:30 am. Based of Plaintiff’s representation that she is no longer incarcerated as of February 2026, Plaintiff is expected to appear at all future hearings including Case Management Conference hearings. If Plaintiff fails to appear and participate in future hearings, the Court will consider dismissing the case for failure to prosecute. The Court shall mail notice of this order to the parties.

2. 20CV01737 Zebley, David v. Zolla Financial, LLC et al.

EVENT: Receiver’s Motion for Order Approving Settlement Agreement

Receiver’s Motion for Order Approving Settlement Agreement is GRANTED. The Court will sign the proposed order.

3-4. 23CV00871 Hector, David v. Murphy, Matthew et al.

EVENT: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Order Compelling Responses to Supplemental Interrogatories and for Monetary Sanctions (2) Defendants’ Motion for Order Compelling Responses to Supplemental Demand for Inspection and Production of Documents

The Court is in receipt of two documents filed by Plaintiff on May 27, 2026 which appear to oppose the motion. Those filings are not being considered by the Court, as the filings are egregiously late. CCP 1005 required any opposition be filed no later than May 20. Also, there is no proof of service attached to Plaintiff’s documents which demonstrate defense counsel was served with the documents. Opposing counsel must be served

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share