FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION VS. ROBERT SPOONER II
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Have Requests For Admission Deemed Admitted
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679281 - May 11, 2026 Hearing date: May 11, 2026 Case number: CUD25679281 Case title: FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION VS. ROBERT SPOONER II Case Number: | | CUD25679281 | Case Title: | | FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION VS. ROBERT SPOONER II | Court Date: | | 2026-05-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Have Requests For Admission Deemed Admitted | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing motion calendar for May 11, 2026, line 9.
Plaintiff's Motion to Have Requests for Admission Deemed Admitted is OFF CALENDAR. No competent proof of service. Moving papers are dated April 1, 2026 and April 21, 2026. Proof of service on file indicates these papers were served on March 31, 2026. This is impossible. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.