DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD26681278·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
GRANTED

650 ELLIS I7, LP VS. NICHOLAS GARRETT ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted

Hearing date
May 8, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Motion to Compel Discovery

Parties

Plaintiff650 ELLIS I7, LP
DefendantNICHOLAS GARRETT

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681278 - May 8, 2026 Hearing date: May 8, 2026 Case number: CUD26681278 Case title: 650 ELLIS I7, LP VS. NICHOLAS GARRETT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681278 | Case Title: | | 650 ELLIS I7, LP VS. NICHOLAS GARRETT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 8, 2026.

Line PLAINTIFF Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Truth of all matters in the Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Set One to Defendant Nicholas Garrett, served April 8, 2026, are deemed admitted. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share