DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC24611418·sf·Civil·Real Property
CONTINUED

HIU TUNG YIP VS. 655 POWELL I5, LP ET AL

Amended MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Defendant Bay Area Community Services, Inc. For Summary Judgment

Hearing date
May 7, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 23, 2026

Motion type

Motion for Summary Judgment

Parties

PlaintiffHIU TUNG YIP
Defendant655 POWELL I5, LP
DefendantBAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24611418 - May 7, 2026 Hearing date: May 7, 2026 Case number: CGC24611418 Case title: HIU TUNG YIP VS. 655 POWELL I5, LP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24611418 | Case Title: | | HIU TUNG YIP VS. 655 POWELL I5, LP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Defendant Bay Area Community Services, Inc. For Summary Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 7, 2026. Line 2.2.

DEFENDANT BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC. Amended MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT / Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Defendant Bay Area Community Services, Inc. For Summary Judgment is continued to June 23, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share