KATHERINE TYLER VS. B&G FOODS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Motion To Compel Defendant B&G Foods, Inc.S Further Responses To Plaintiffs Special Interrogatories [Set One] And Request For Monetary Sanctions
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Further Responses · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: KATHERINE TYLER
- Defendant: B&G FOODS, INC.
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25626318 - May 7, 2026 Hearing date: May 7, 2026 Case number: CGC25626318 Case title: KATHERINE TYLER VS. B&G FOODS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626318 | Case Title: | | KATHERINE TYLER VS. B&G FOODS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-07 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel Defendant B&G Foods, Inc.S Further Responses To Plaintiffs Special Interrogatories [Set One] And Request For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, May 07, 2026, Line 6.
2 - Katherine Tyler's motion to compel defendant B&G Foods, Inc. to serve further responses to her set one special interrogatories 1-5 and 21 and for monetary sanctions is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
B&G shall serve verified code-compliant further responses to interrogatories 1-5 and 21 without objections within 15 days of notice of this order. B&G and its counsel shall pay $2,680 in reasonable monetary sanctions to Tyler within 20 days of notice of this order. The parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding a protective order, meaning they are ordered to make a reasonable and good faith effort to agree on a protective order. (See Code of Civ. Pro. section 2016.040.)
All of B&G's objections lack merit. The six interrogatories all seek discovery relevant information and B&G has failed to substantiate any of its objections. B&G's duty is to provide the best responsive information available to it. Because B&G's responses lack substantial justification, Tyler is entitled to monetary sanctions. However, the amount she seeks is excessive. The court calculated the amount as reasonably incurred five hours of attorney time at $400 per hour plus $80 in claimed costs. To the extent Plaintiff seeks additional or different relief, those requests are denied.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |