DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25623811·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

JULIANA HILL VS. 735 TAYLOR I1, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE

Hearing date
May 6, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Motion to Strike

Causes of action

Negligent Infliction of Emotional DistressNegligence

Parties

PlaintiffJULIANA HILL
Defendant735 TAYLOR I1, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623811 - May 6, 2026 Hearing date: May 6, 2026 Case number: CGC25623811 Case title: JULIANA HILL VS. 735 TAYLOR I1, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623811 | Case Title: | | JULIANA HILL VS. 735 TAYLOR I1, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 6, 2026. Line 3.1.

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Motion is granted as to the cause of action for NIED to be re-pled within a cause of action for negligence. Motion is otherwise denied. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share