DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC20588622·sf·Civil·Compliance Hearing
CONTINUED; OSC DISCHARGED

NICOLAS NEUTALL VS. URBAN ALCHEMY ET AL

Compliance Hearing; Order to Show Cause re Sanctions

Hearing date
May 6, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 8, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffNICOLAS NEUTALL
DefendantURBAN ALCHEMY

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, May 06, 2026, Line 2.

The Compliance Hearing is CONTINUED TO JULY 8, 2026, AT 9 AM IN THIS DEPARTMENT and the 2/4/2026 Order to Show Cause re Sanctions is DISCHARGED. NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

Good cause appearing, The Compliance Hearing is continued to July 8, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in this department. The Order to Show Cause is discharged without sanctions being imposed. No personal appearance is required.

At this point in the proceeding, the court will not approve the cy pres approach. The parties need to submit a firm plan for a prompt third distribution or prompt deposit of the residual uncashed funds with the State Controller in the name of the participating class member. Ultimately, residual uncashed funds will have to be deposited with the State Controller in the name of the participating class member.

At least ten court days before the next hearing, Plaintiff must file a declaration or declarations from appropriate parties articulating the plan for final distribution with a firm deadline for each action. Courtesy copies must be provided to the court within one court day of filing. Plaintiff is ordered to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the above text and email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the time set for this hearing.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share