DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-21-795406·sf·FamilyLaw·Child Custody and Visitation
Hearing 2 months agoThe parties shall appear in person or by Zoom and be prepared to discuss issues

KILLIAN KOEPSELL v. INA KALO KOEPSELL

REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY AND/OR VISITATION; REBUTTAL OF FAMILY CODE 3044; CHANGE OF FAMILY THERAPY; PERMIT CHILD'S ENROLLMENT & ATTENDANCE AT UCLA SUMMER PROGRAM

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
404
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerKILLIAN KOEPSELL
RespondentINA KALO KOEPSELL

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 KILLIAN KOEPSELL,) Case Number: FDI-21-795406) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 11, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 INA KALO KOEPSELL,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: MARTIN TRIANO) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD 13 CUSTODY AND/OR VISITATION (ORDERS) CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, REBUTTAL OF 14 FAMILY CODE 3044 AND REQUESTS RELATED TO JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR 15 ORDER RE: CHANGE OF FAMILY THERAPY; REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHILD CUSTODY, 16 VISITATION (PARENTING TIME, PERMIT CHILD'S ENROLLMENT & ATTENDANCE AT UCLA 17 SUMMER PROGRAM 18 TENTATIVE RULING 19 The parties shall appear in person or by Zoom and be prepared to discuss any issues and 20 concerns that remain unresolved following mediation, including Mother’s request for joint legal 21 custody, Mother’s request for permission to travel to Europe with Ella from July 10, 2026 through 22 August 13, 2026, and Mother’s request that Father coordinate with her to secure a sublet 23 apartment for Ella during the period Ella attends the UCLA Teen Arch Program from June 22, 24 2026 to July 10, 2026.

The Court intends to set a future hearing date on all other issues not 25 mentioned here. 26 If a party chooses to appear by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions 27 for Remote Appearance in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 28

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share