DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC23606759·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

NKECHI EMERUWA-NEUBERG VS. FRANK LUCCHETTI ET AL

MOTION TO TAX COSTS

Hearing date
Apr 30, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Motion to Tax Costs

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,359.80

Parties

PlaintiffNKECHI EMERUWA-NEUBERG
DefendantFRANK LUCCHETTI

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 30, 2026. Line 4. PLAINTIFF NKECHI EMERUWA-NEUBERG AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION TO TAX COSTS is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Motion is granted in the amount of $1,359.80. Motion is otherwise denied. The remaining costs subject to the motion are reasonable and necessary. Further, the Court exercises its discretion to allow costs under Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 1014. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share