DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV164825·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

CROLL vs BALDRIDGE

Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
24
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJohn Michael Croll
DefendantBaldridge

Ruling

26CV164825: CROLL vs BALDRIDGE 07/08/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal in Department 24

Tentative Ruling - 07/06/2026 Rebekah Evenson

The court DISMISSES the entire action pursuant to the notice of settlement.

Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement. Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1385(b), the court must dismiss the entire case 45 days after a notice of unconditional settlement, and 45 days after the dismissal date specified in a notice of conditional settlement, unless good cause is shown why the case should not be dismissed.

No party filed any documents in advance of the compliance hearing to advise the court that the matter should not be dismissed. Accordingly, the entire action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the notice of settlement.

The Court orders the Complaint filed by John Michael Croll on 01/15/2026 dismissed with prejudice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share