GARY ERWIN VS. BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST Amended COMPLAINT
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Strike
Parties
- Plaintiff: GARY ERWIN
- Defendant: BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION
- Defendant: KEN LOMBARD
- Defendant: REBECCA HLEBASKO
- Defendant: COURTNEY MCGHEE
- Defendant: MAHADAYE LECOUNTE
- Defendant: LORAINE SEZAR
- Defendant: GREAT PRARIE RISK SOLUTIONS
- Defendant: KEN NOVACK
Ruling
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 29, 2026. Line 4. DEFENDANT BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION, KEN LOMBARD, REBECCA HLEBASKO, COURTNEY MCGHEE, MAHADAYE LECOUNTE, LORAINE SEZAR, GREAT PRARIE RISK SOLUTIONS, KEN NOVACK MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST Amended COMPLAINT is GRANTED in part. Paragraphs 23(c), 32(c), and 48(c) only are stricken from the First Amended Complaint.
Defendants contend, and Plaintiff does not deny, that these allegations are all based solely on a cease-and-desist communication sent by Defendants' counsel, demanding Plaintiff cease certain conduct and advising him that Defendants may commence legal action against him based on said conduct. This demand, made in anticipation of potential legal action, is protected activity within the meaning of CCP 425.16, and Plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing that he can prevail on the merits of his claims based on this activity.
However, the Second, Fourth, and Seventh causes of action are each based on both this protected activity, and on other, unprotected activity. Therefore, to whatever extent Defendants' request to strike these causes of action in their entirety, such request is denied. Plaintiff's claims based on Defendants' alleged unprotected activity cannot be stricken under CCP 425.16 simply because they appear in the same causes of action as claims based on protected activity, which are properly subject to CCP 425.16.
Request for reasonable attorneys fees and costs is denied without prejudice at this time, as there is no supporting declaration regarding these fees and costs accompanying this motion. Additionally, Plaintiff is admonished to observe the appropriate page limits for all future filings. (See, e.g., California Rules of Court, 3.1113.) =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |