DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC24612213·sf·Civil·Real Property
GRANTED

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS. EDINBURGH CASTLE, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP ET AL

Motion For Order To Approve The Sale Of Receivership Property Commonly Known As 950 Geary Street, San Francisco, California [Apn Lot 011, Block 0693] Free And Clear Of All Liens And Encumbrances With All Liens And Encumbrances To Attach In Order Of Priority

Hearing date
Apr 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffU.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
DefendantEDINBURGH CASTLE, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 24, 2026. Line 2. OTHER JAMES PAUL Motion For Order To Approve The Sale Of Receivership Property Commonly Known As 950 Geary Street, San Francisco, California [Apn Lot 011, Block 0693] is GRANTED. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share